Jack Lyon

My Places

In the Open, Save, and Save As dialogs in recent versions of Word, there's a large vertical toolbar on the left-hand side of the dialog. The toolbar has buttons on it that make it easy to get to such places as My Documents and Desktop. Appropriately enough, the name of the toolbar is "My Places." Or maybe that's not so appropriate, since in any version of Word before 2002, there's no way to modify this toolbar--at least no way I've been able to find.

But in Word 2002 there is a way to add places (folders) to the toolbar. Why should you care? Because doing so will give you quick and easy access to your latest editing projects without having to navigate all over the place. Here's how to add a folder you want to use:

1. Click the "File" menu and then click "Open," "Save," or "Save As."

2. In the dialog that opens, navigate to the folder you want to add to the My Places toolbar.

3. Click the folder so it's active.

4. Click the "Tools" menu at the top of the Save As dialog.

5. Click "Add to My Places."

That will add the folder to the My Places bar. You may need to click the down arrow at the bottom of the bar to see the folder you added. However, you can move the folder up in the list by right-clicking it and then clicking "Move Up." (You can also move it down by clicking "Move Down.") If you want to remove the folder from the bar, right-click it and then click "Remove." You'll notice that you can't remove the existing folders, such as My Documents. They're there to stay.

If you eventually accumulate too many folders to handle, you can better manage them by reducing the size of their icons (which, by default, are *huge*). To do so, right-click one of the folders and then click "Small Icons."

Thanks to Michael C. Coleman for suggesting this article.

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

I've received so many great tips from readers that there's just not room to include them all in a single newsletter. So if your tip isn't here, please be patient. I'll be including it soon.

The previous newsletter included a tip for editing in Print Preview. A number of readers wrote to say there's an easier way: click the Magnifier button (it looks like a magnifying glass over a piece of paper) on the Print Preview toolbar. You'll then be able to edit away. The Magnifier button is a toggle, so after you're through editing, you can click it again to return to Print Preview. Many thanks to all who sent this tip and the others below. Keep those email messages coming!

Bill Rubidge sent some additional tips for working in Print Preview:

You can invoke print preview with a macro, and set yourself to edit mode, with this bit of VBA:

ActiveDocument.PrintPreview

ActiveDocument.ActiveWindow.View.Magnifier = False

You might also use this bit of VBA to set a page-width zoom:

ActiveWindow.ActivePane.View.Zoom.PageFit = wdPageFitBestFit

I also believe you can enter full-screen view with this:

ActiveWindow.View.FullScreen = True

Full screen view is nice if you want to edit in a true WYSIWYG mode, without distraction from any tools, and if your computer is powerful enough or your document simple enough that editing in this mode works fast.

You also have access to all the standard Word commands in print preview mode, even if you can't see the icons and the menus. I avoid using the mouse and icons as much as possible, and just invoke the commands I want using the keyboard shortcuts for the menu bar.

One final suggestion--if you have a document set up to print on both sides of the page, so that you will have facing pages in the final bound document, you can set print preview to show you two pages side by side. If you use full screen view, you can usually read the documents, if you have a big enough display and set the resolution to a good size like 1024 x 768. This view in edit mode is especially useful if you are trying to do nice layout in Word. You can adjust your page breaks to balance your layout across pages. (I recommend fixing page breaks with keep-with-next paragraph commands and start-new-page paragraph commands, rather than page breaks. That way, you won't have as much to undo if you make text edits and the content gets pushed around.)

___________________________

Phil Rabichow wrote:

Just thought I'd mention something in follow-up to your article on Document Preview. You would think that if you open a document, go to File > Properties, and check the "Save preview picture," then you would have a picture as you describe in your article--one that you can see, read, and scroll through.

However, it's just the opposite! If you check that box, two things happen:

1. The file size grows.

2. You only see a snapshot in preview mode in the File > Open dialog box--and you can't scroll. The snapshot is so small (in Word 2000, anyhow), you can't read anything. Moral: never check that box.

___________________________

Eric Fletcher wrote:

I've been away for a bit and just caught up on the last few newsletters. I see you've been delving into one of my favorite features of Word: the document properties dialog.

Several years ago we had a huge job coordinating publication of ~300 publications in three languages from numerous authors. Each publication would be in any of several different phases at any time so I knew document management was going to be critical. To deal with it, I set up a template with a "cover page" consisting of styled fields to show information from the document properties, then very fastidiously followed a rigorous naming convention with the "Show document properties when saving" option set on.

I've attached a sample document so you can see what I mean. [Editor's note: To maintain privacy, I have not made this document available, but you should still be able to get an idea of what Eric is talking about from his comments.] Here are a few of the features:

1. The cover page has fielded info from the Summary part of the properties dialog. Title, subject, keywords, and comments are styled to display. The "comments" field has a running history of where the file has been. Our procedure copies the subject each time the file is saved with a new name (actually, it migrates through sets of folders; in our case, CHP-A through CHP-D as it moves through various set stages) and appends it to the end of the comments field so I keep the history with the file.

2. Some of the other fields are in the statistics tab: pages, words, creation date--and even some math to show things like average number of words per page (for our client's purposes originally but now very useful for quoting on similar work).

3. I set up a custom field "Default language" to identify the default spelling dictionary and display it on the cover page. We often do work in English, French, and Spanish, so it is helpful to be able to see at a glance what language is set as the default. The value and the setting is managed by a custom macro. (Custom fields can be very useful but the feature is poorly documented.)

4. Since we include the cover page for the client, we type any notes they need to see here so they can send the document off to their author without the notes if they choose. The page number references are fields referring to bookmarks, so we can be quite specific without having to worry about pagination differences. (Sometimes the files are sent electronically and printed at their site.)

5. Although this is a bit removed from the properties dialog, I've included sample portions of the proforma table of contents for the styled headings (we provide all levels at the interim stages so they can see the structure of their work--often handy for reducing confusion without having to be a heavy!) and the ToC for figures. The latter is seldom used in finals but we've found it helps a lot in author reviews since many of them are most keen to see that aspect of the text rather than re-reading the entire content.

I've cadged together various macros to generate summary documents using the properties fields: for example, I can list all files in the CHP-B stage in French and show the number of words. Such macros usually end up being job-specific, but they can be real lifesavers if there are large numbers of files. Of course, a well-thought-out naming convention is critical as well--but if you use the properties, you can greatly extend the number of variables to uniquely identify a particular file.

Oh, and a final tip: since I never use the Insert key, I map the File > Properties command to it. So, to see my properties dialog, I just hit Insert. (And if your finger slips going for Delete or Home, having a dialog pop up is pretty harmless--and reminds one of the usefulness of the feature!

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

MyInfo is an outlining and organizational tool I've been using for the past few weeks to keep track of all kinds of ideas, notes, and projects. The program's Web site describes it as a "tool for individuals who need a better way for storing and working with their personal and business information," noting, "It was designed to help you organize documents, ideas and projects easily."

The program certainly does that, and it has a number of features that I think sets it apart from other such organizers:

* Customizable, sortable columns. For me, this is the big one. It means I can sort my many notes by category or deadline or status or just about anything else I can dream up. I can even create my own drop-down list of items to choose from. This is a *nice* feature that I've seen nowhere else.

* Item cloning. If I have a note in one folder, I can have a duplicate in another folder, and whenever I make a change in either one of them, that change is also made automatically in the other. In effect, I can file a note under many different category folders at the same time. If I have a note about creativity, for example, I can store it (cloned) under "Thinking," "Writing," and "Inventing" without worrying about keeping the clones in synch.

* Save options. You can save all or selected items in RTF format using all kinds of slick options, such as automatic item numbering, custom dividers, and comments.

* Fast, intuitive navigation.

* Usability. MyInfo has one of the cleanest program interfaces I've seen, making even its most advanced features simple to use.

If you're looking for an easy, effective way to organize your projects and your life, you'll definitely want to look at this program. You can learn more (and try it!) here:

http://www.milenix.com/myinfo.php

Document Preview

Maybe I'm just dense, but I've found another Word feature that I've been wanting but didn't know existed--document preview. If you've read the past couple of newsletters, you know I've been spending a lot of time poking around Word's Open dialog, and this is my latest discovery. To use the feature:

1. Click File > Open.

2. In the window on the left, find some Word documents and click one of them so it's selected.

3. The toolbar at the top of the Open dialog includes several buttons. At the far right is the "Tools" button. Next to it, on the left, is the Views button, which isn't labeled but looks like a tiny list of files. Just to the right of the Views icon is a tiny down-arrow. Click that arrow to see the different views that are available.

4. One of the views is called "Preview." Go ahead--click it.

5. Wow! In the window to the right, you'll see a preview of the document contents. You can even use the scroll bar on the right of the window to scroll through the document. On my computer, quite a few file types will work, including HTML.

Now you can see what's in a document *before* you open it, so no more opening a document just to find it's not the one you wanted. Very handy!

By the way, this feature works in Word 95, 97, 2000, and 2002. (The Open dialog in Word 2001 on a Macintosh has a "Show Preview" button, but on my Mac the feature never seems to show anything.)

Here's a bonus tip: In Word 2002, you can change the size of the Open dialog by clicking and dragging the lower left corner with your mouse. Make that window as big as you like. Now you can really see those previews. Nice!

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

Christopher Seal sent the following tip for editing in Print Preview:

I find it annoying that when scrolling through a Word document in Print Preview mode that when the mode is closed the document reopens at the page where you were when you opened Print Preview. You could be at page 1, then go into Print Preview mode, scroll through checking page balancing or whatever, and then see some text you want to change on page 127.

So you exit Print Preview, find yourself at page 1, then find the text on page 127. It is so much quicker to edit the text in Print Preview mode when you see what you want to change. Here's how.

With the main document in Print Preview mode, open another Word document in Normal mode. Now refocus on the main document, which you left in Print Preview mode. The cursor is now an I-bar, allowing you to edit the text.

Works in Word 2000 on Windows 98 and 2002(XP) on Windows 2000.

Many thanks to Christopher!

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

Scribendi, a multi-service editorial company, features some great pictures and a screensaver especially for editors. You can join the fun here:

http://www.scribendi.com/screensave.htm

While you're there, check out the company's editing services:

http://www.scribendi.com/

Sorting by Document Property

Last week's newsletter introduced the idea of using Microsoft Word to search for Word documents to which you've assigned certain properties, such as categories or keywords. This week we'll look at how to sort by those properties in a folder. I've learned, however, that this will not work in Windows 95 or 98. In XP, it works great, and it may work in some other versions.

Before you can sort by document properties, you'll have to assign those properties. Here's the basic procedure:

1. With a document open in Word, click File > Properties.

2. Click the Summary tab.

3. Enter the information by which you'll later want to sort. For example, you could enter a category, keywords, or a comment.

4. Save the document.

5. Repeat steps 1 through 4 for other documents. Note that you should really do these steps whenever you create a new document. Word can help you with this by automatically opening the Properties dialog the first time you save a document. To activate this feature, click Tools > Options > Save > Prompt for document properties.

You can also assign properties outside of Word by right-clicking a file in a folder and then clicking "Properties" and the Summary tab.

After assigning the properties you want to use, you can sort by those properties in Windows Explorer or any Windows folder. To do so:

1. Open the folder you want to use.

2. Click the View menu and then "Details." You should now see a line of buttons above your list of files. The buttons will have names like "Name," "Date Modified," and "Size." To sort your files by one of these properties, click the button for that property. For example, to sort your files by the date they were modified, click the "Date Modified" button.

3. Now, the good stuff. Take your mouse and right-click that button bar. Wow, look at all the properties you can include on the button bar!

4. For the really good stuff, click "More . . ." at the bottom of the menu.

5. Put a check in the box for the items you want to use, such as "Subject" and "Category." Then click the Okay button. Wow again! Now you can see those properties in your file list. (Note that you can apply these settings to all of your folders, if you like. To do so, click Tools > Folder Options > View > Apply to All Folders.)

6. Click the button for the property by which you want to sort. Pretty slick!

How can you use this feature? Well, how about keeping track of all documents from a particular author? Or maybe you'd want to group chapters that belong to a certain section of a book. How about using the feature as a document database that allows you to group all documents (from a variety of projects) by a particular subject? There are lots of possibilities.

On a Macintosh, life isn't quite so glorious. There's no way (that I know of) to sort by Word document properties in a folder (at least in OS 9.1, which I'm using). You can, however, sort by properties that you assign to files *outside* of Word. To do so:

1. Open the folder you want to use.

2. Click View > View Options.

3. Under "Show Columns," put a check in the box for the properties you want to display and sort. "Comments" and "Label" are really the only customizable properties available here. Note that you can also set these for all folders under Edit > Preferences > Views.

4. Select a file to which you want to assign properties.

5. Press Command + I to bring up the General Information dialog.

6. In the Comments box, enter the text by which you want to sort. For example, you could type a category or keyword here.

7. If you like, click the Label button and assign a category such as "Essential," "In Progress," or "Project 1."

8. Close the dialog to save your changes.

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

William T. Buckley wrote:

When I went to test your instructions in the DOCUMENT PROPERTIES portion of the Editorium for this week--06.11.2003--I found they did not work, at least not on my setup.

I am using Word 2002 (10.4524.4219) SP-2, running on Win2K professional.

After I read your discussion of the usefulness of the document properties capability, I then moved on to your detailed instructions:

* I clicked File > Open.

* I located the "Tools" button on the upper right of the dialog.

* BUT, when I went to look for "Find" under "Tools," there was no such option available in the dialog.

So I am unable to go forward with your instructions. And I'm at a loss to explain why. Is it me, my Word software, my OS, all of the above, none of the above?

I responded that before publishing these instructions, I really should have checked to see how the feature has changed in Word 2002, which now uses the term "Search" instead of "Find." Also, after clicking "Search," it's now necessary to click the "Advanced" tab, which will get you into the fancy features I described in the newsletter.

Thanks to William for his questions and comments.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

Jim Cronin wrote:

Anyone who appreciates acerbic wit will love this screensaver from Deloitte Touche Consultants:

http://www.dc.com/bullfighter

The free Bullfighter program, which roots out consultant-speak, also uses the same biting comments as it diagnoses one's writing.

Thanks, Jim!

Document Properties

I've been thinking a lot lately about document management--that is, how to keep better track of all those Microsoft Word files I have floating around my computer. One tool I've neglected is Word's Properties feature. If you work in a law office, you probably know all about it. But if you work in a publishing house, like me, you may not even know this tool exists.

To see the Properties feature in action, open a Word document (or create a new one). Then click File > Properties. The Properties dialog will open, and you'll see five tabs:

General

Summary

Statistics

Contents

Custom

I'm not going to cover all of these tabs or their contents, but I would like to call your attention to the one that looks most useful for document management--the Summary tab.

Most of the items on the Summary tab are self-explanatory, but the important thing to note is that you can enter or modify any of them. In particular, I'm interested in the Subject, Category, and Keywords boxes. Why? Because if I type information into these boxes, I can do two very cool things. One of them is to search for files with a particular subject, category, or keyword.

Here's how:

1. Click File > Open.

2. Locate the "Tools" button on the upper right of the dialog. Did you know that was there?

3. Click "Find." Wow, is that a nifty dialog or what?

4. In the "Property" dropdown list, find the item you want to search, such as "Subject."

5. In the "Condition" list, find the conditions that fit the search you want to do, such as "Includes words" or "Begins with phrase."

6. In the "Value" box, type the words or phrase that you want to find in the property you selected from the "Property" list.

Here's an example. If I wanted to find all my files on the subject of elephants, I'd choose "Subject," "Includes words," and "elephant." Note that this won't find the *word* "elephants" in the text of a document. Rather, it will find all of the files whose Subject *property* includes the word "elephants."

7. Click the "Add to List" button. The search element you just defined will appear in the big box at the top of the dialog.

8. Click the "Find Now" button.

Word will search through your files and display those that match your search. Then you can open the files you want to work on. Note that you can narrow your searches by adding more than one item, that you can save your searches to use again later, and that there are various other features to help you refine your searches. You can learn more about each feature by clicking the Help button (labeled with a question mark) and then clicking the feature you want to know more about.

I mentioned that there were two cool things that can be done with document properties. One of them is searching. The other one is to sort by document properties in Windows Explorer. I'll reveal the details next week.

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

After reading last week's newsletter on using styles in Word 2002 while avoiding the Task Pane, Jim Cronin wrote:

Prior to Word 2002, you could redefine a style by making direct formatting alterations in a paragraph then clicking on the style name in the toolbar's Style drop-down list and pressing Enter twice. This was a lot easier and quicker than using Word 2002's Task Pane. The solution is to click Tools > Options from the toolbar, select the Edit tab and ensure the "Prompt to update style" checkbox is selected.

Romke Soldaat sent some other useful style commands to add to your custom Styles toolbar as mentioned in last week's newsletter:

Apply Heading 1

Apply Heading 2

Apply Heading 3

Style by Example

Modify Style

Redefine Style

Rename Style

Delete Style

Style

Style Gallery

Romke also sent a nifty little macro that you can add to your toolbar. The macro displays Word's Organizer feature, all set so you can organize styles:


Sub OrganizeStyles
With Dialogs(wdDialogOrganizer)
.DefaultTab = wdDialogOrganizerTabStyles
.Show
End With
End Sub

If you don't know how to use macros like that one, you can find out here.

Thanks to Jim and Romke for these great tips.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

I have been sick, sick, sick of my computer running so slow. Then it dawned on me: spyware! I quickly downloaded, installed, and ran Spybot Search & Destroy, from PepiMK Software. Now my computer is back under my control. If you've got similar problems, you might want to check this out:

http://security.kolla.de/index.php?lang=en&page=start

There's no charge for the program, and on my computer it worked well. Your mileage may vary. If you want to try it, be *sure* to read the documentation before proceeding.

Style Dialogs in Word 2002

The Styles and Formatting Task Pane in Word 2002 is a useful feature, but, keyboard junkie that I am, I just hate reaching for the mouse every time I need to create or modify a style--and the Task Pane doesn't seem to work with the keyboard. Isn't there a way to get back Word's old Style dialog? Or better yet, how about a way to access Word 2002's fancy new Modify Style dialog (which has the most commonly used options right there) without having to drill down through the Task Pane and a couple of other dialogs?

The beauty of Word is that almost anything is possible, and although I'm unhappy with some of what Microsoft has done to increase the "marketability" of my favorite word processor, I'm glad they've had the good sense to leave in (and even add) some great features, even if they're sometimes buried pretty deep.

If you want to get back the keyboard-controllable Style dialog, do this:

1. Click Tools > Macro > Macros.

2. Click the "Macros In" dropdown list.

3. In the list, click "Word commands."

4. In the "Macro name" list, use the scroll bar to find "FormatStyle."

5. Click "FormatStyle."

6. Click "Run."

Wow! There's the friendly Style dialog, ready to be controlled through keyboard commands (or, if you insist, with your mouse). No Task Pane needed!

Of course, you're not going to want to drill down through Tools > Macro > Macros every time you want to use the dialog, so you might as well put the command on a toolbar button, a menu, or a keyboard shortcut, as described here:

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707286867

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707444986

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1713088939

While we're playing around with style commands, there are some others you might want to add to a toolbar, menu, or keyboard shortcut. If you work with styles a lot, you could even create a Styles menu or toolbar devoted entirely to these commands:

* FormatStyleModify (which lets you modify styles)

* FormatStyleNew (which lets you create new styles)

* FormatStyleGallery (which lets you see the styles in your various Word templates)

* FormatStyleVisibility (which lets you hide or display text depending on the style applied; where has *this* been all my life?)

Now are you happier with Word 2002? I know I am.

Note: If you're a Mac user, the procedure should be basically the same in Word 2003.

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

Wordmeister Steve Hudson sent an interesting response to a question about why Word's features sometimes seem to work differently depending on where they are accessed in Word. (His references to Maggie, Douggie, and Mal will mean more if you subscribe to the WORD PC-LIST; for more information, see today's Resource column.) Steve's answer is complex and has to do with the inner workings of Microsoft Word and VBA programming, so if you want to know more about that, Steve's your man. Here's what he had to say:

Word is like this really complex programme beastie, right? I mean HIDEOUSLY complex. If it were a house we could pack it with all the Word PC List users and play a single game of hide and seek that went for WEEKS! So, we go searching for the Queen, Maggie. We find her sensibly hidden in the backwaters of a partial wing known as Table Properties. She is in a long corridor with many doors off it, one of which is labelled Sort, and you have a squizzy down there and see a corridor branching off into a few other corridors.

You know Father Douggy is into macros, so you think you'll look there for him. You backtrack and begin looking. Your wanderings lead you into the room of Macros, off the main wing of Tools. You find the venerable Cardinal Mal, poking around with some suspicious-looking strings attached to a strange object. He is calling it a Guitar and wants to implement a new RocknRoll method. But you still haven't found Douggy yet, so you ask Mal where he is. "Oh, he was with Maggie." You think, "Uh huh! I know he's near here, and he's near Maggie, so I'll look in the Sort Ascending room!"

You go through the door marked Commands, and it opens out into a long, winding corridor full of doors and stairways. You wander along until you come to the Sort Ascending room, and you walk in on the ground floor. No Douggy. Then you look up and realise Douggy is standing on a balcony with no way up for you. You ask, "How did you get there?" He replies, "I came via a different way than you."

So, there's our analogy; let's get a little more "real world" with the next pass, huh? 🙂 Mind you, this all in generality can be applied to many facets of the facade (Word's user interface); it's not just applicable for SortSuspenders.

Word is a complex beastie full of little snippets of code that do things. These snippets are called on by other snippets until we have a facade full of bugs, err features, undocumented or otherwise. My tools are developed in a similar fashion, so this is quite normal. I have really generic routines hiding behind the walls of methods that then present exact instances of their usage.

Let's take a simple example. I write a piece of code to strip styling from a range; I don't care what the range is, just give me a range. Now that's useless to tie to the GUI (graphical user interface); how does the user specify the range? We are much better off giving access to it using sensible ranges that the user scenario requires: one to strip the selection only, one to strip the whole document, and one to strip every document in the folder. All of these call the same backing routine; thus, in a sense, they are wrappers to the hidden method.

A method is just a Sub or Function in OOL-speak (object-oriented language). A Document is an object. It has a Save method. This means there is a Document class definition somewhere that has a little function sitting in it called Save that has the code to do the saving business. This manifests in our IDE (the VBE--Visual Basic editor) as a Document.Save method! Clever, huh? You can build your own classes to play further with this.

So, I write this dialog for dealing with tables. I whack all sorts of extra smarts into it to give a nice user experience. These smarts then finally end up calling the basic routines to provide the functionality--such as Sort. My first attempt, I don't bother selecting the whole table, and the support phone starts ringing like someone whose spouse is two days late home from the pub. "I keep getting an error when sorting," they all say. Moron users. What do they know? But I have to do something with my time other than keep the coffee machine empty, so I include the smarts to select the whole table if pressing the button through the smarty dialog. I do not alter the base function at all.

I then sit down and have a caffeine-free moment and realise, hang on, what if some GENIUS dudes, like me, come along and want to sort just bits of a document? I know, I'll write a quick wrapper to give them access to the sort function. I have no idea what their data will look like, so I can't provide any trickery; that's all up to them as I have a pizza to order. You have to order pizza early, otherwise it is still warm when you go to eat it.

So now we have two different ways to get at the same underlying functionality. One way has all sorts of extras chucked in. The other doesn't. They are both merely wrappers to get to the routine that actually does the sort work; one is fancier but less flexible than the other.

Thanks to Steve for his comments.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

The WORD PC-LIST is, in my opinion, *the* place to go for expert online advice about using Word:

To join, send an email message here:

mailto:word-pc-subscribe-request@liverpool.ac.uk (no subject or command text required)

You can read the list archives here:

http://listserv.liv.ac.uk/archives/word-pc.html

Compare Vs. Merge

If you do paperless proofreading (as described in the newsletter for May 14), you've probably bumped into some of the same problems I've had with comparing documents (Tools > Track Changes > Compare Documents) and merging documents (Tools > Merge Documents). In particular, sometimes I'll go to compare two documents and get the following message:

"The new document already has changes. Word may ignore some existing changes. Compare anyway?"

At other times I'll go to merge documents and get this cryptic notice:

"The merged documents contain unmarked changes. Do you want to merge up to the first untracked change?"

If you've had similar problems, maybe you'd be interested in better understanding Compare and Merge.

On the surface, Compare and Merge look a lot alike. They're both ways to show the differences between documents, right? Wrong. Well, okay, the Compare feature *is* a way to do that--in documents that don't already include tracked revisions. Merge, however, is something completely different--a way to combine documents that *already* contain tracked revisions and that have previously been "protected" for that very purpose. Here's a breakdown of the two features:

Compare's reason for living is to mark the differences between two documents.

Merge's reason for living is to combine tracked changes from two or more copies of the same document.

Compare expects that the documents are different (an original manuscript versus an edited manuscript, for example).

Merge expects that the documents are identical except for tracked changes.

Compare doesn't care where the documents came from.

Merge expects that the documents came from two or more different people--in other words, that the documents were reviewed on different computers than the one on which they are being merged. (If you want to get really specific, Word checks the name of the person who last saved the file. This name is set under Tools > Options > User Information.)

Compare expects that the documents do *not* already include tracked revisions. (If they do, you'll get the error message mentioned earlier.)

Merge expects that the documents *do* include tracked revisions (although they don't have to).

Compare doesn't care whether the documents have been protected for revisions or not.

Merge expects that the documents *have* been protected for revisions. (If they're not, you may get the error message mentioned earlier.)

Here's the breakdown in table form:

Compare Merge

Combines revision marks No Yes

Marks revisions Yes No

Documents are identical No Yes

Documents are from different reviewers No Yes

Documents contain revisions No Yes

Documents are protected for revisions No Yes

Use Compare when you have two different versions of the same unmarked document and want to see the differences between them.

Use Merge when you have reviewed documents that were originally identical and want to see the combined revisions from different reviewers.

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

After reading the article on paperless proofreading, Dave Gayman wrote:

Beyond the automated means for proofreading that have been recently discussed, there's a final method that I absolutely must use--because my brain has a way of blithely seeing what I intend to say, rather than what's actually on the screen or page.

I have the computer read the file to me. Of course, to do this, your computer must have sound capabilities--but most computers do, these days--plus software that synthesizes human speech from text files.

This is the single-practitioner equivalent to the standard editing group procedure in which the newest member of the team is chained to a chair and forced to read to the proofreader.

For the PC, there are a number of text-to-speech options out there; I happen to use an old one, no longer available and no longer supported. Search for "text to speech" in your favorite Web search engine. Look for one that "reads" from the Windows clipboard, so that all you have to do is select text you want the computer to read to you, then hit CTRL+C or Edit > Copy. Avoid the ones that are designed specifically for medical use, as they typically have inflated prices, thanks in large part to medical insurance.

A second must-have option is the ability to control the speed of reading; you'll find that different speech engines (and different voices within each engine) provide different default speeds, and some defaults are too slow or too fast for optimum, follow-along reading.

If you have extra money lying around, and if the package you choose has optional voices, shell out for the high-end voices. Their sound and speech quality is much better than the standard ones.

-----------------

Last week, Anna Marshall wrote with the following question: "Do you or any of your readers have a macro that will take comments out of the comments area and paste them into the running text of a document?"

I received not just one macro but *three,* one from Steve Hudson and two from Clive Tolley. Many thanks to them! Before using these "in the real world," try them on some test documents to make sure they do what you want. You can also edit the macros if necessary to better suit your needs.


Sub CommentsToInline()
'Copies comment initials and text inline between square brackets,
'leaving original comments in place.
Dim C As Comment
Dim S As String
For Each C In ActiveDocument.Comments
S = C.Range.Text
S = " [" & C.Initial & ": " & S & "]"
C.Reference.InsertAfter S
Next
Set C = Nothing
End Sub
Sub CECopyComments()
'Copies the open file's comments to another file
'and saves this under the same name + '_COM'
'VBA routine written by Clive Tolley, 18.05.03
Dim Doc1 As String
Dim DocName As String
Dim DocPath As String
Dim i As Integer
Doc1 = ActiveDocument
i = Len(ActiveDocument.Name)
DocPath = ActiveDocument.Path + ""
DocName = Left(ActiveDocument.Name, i - 4)
If ActiveDocument.Comments.Count >= 1 Then
ActiveDocument.StoryRanges(wdCommentsStory).Copy
End If
Documents.Add
Selection.Paste
ActiveDocument.SaveAs FileName:=DocPath + DocName + "_COM.doc"
End Sub
Sub CEIncorporateComments()
'Removes comments and incorporates their text
'into the main text of the document,
'adding a space before.
'VBA routine written by Clive Tolley, 22.05.03
Dim i As Integer
If ActiveDocument.Comments.Count < 1 Then
MsgBox "There are no comments in this file!"
Else
For i = 1 To ActiveDocument.Comments.Count
ActiveDocument.Comments(1).Range.Copy
Selection.GoTo What:=wdGoToComment, Which:=wdGoToAbsolute, Count:=1
Selection.Collapse Direction:=wdCollapseStart
Selection.TypeText " "
Selection.PasteSpecial DataType:=wdPasteText
ActiveDocument.Comments(1).Delete
Next i
End If
End Sub

If you don't know how to use macros like these, you can learn how here.

Thanks to all for their contributions.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

Ron F Woolley offers desktop publishing tutorials, HTML tutorials, and lots of other interesting stuff on his Web site from Down Under:

http://www.dtp-aus.com/

Reviewing Revisions with the Keyboard

Last week's article on paperless proofreading explained how to use Word's Reviewing toolbar to review revisions in a merged document. It's a great tool except for one thing: the need to locate and click those tiny toolbar buttons for every revision you want to find, accept, or reject. Wouldn't it be nice to use the same commands from the keyboard? Here's how:

1. Click Tools > Customize > Commands > Keyboard.

2. In the Categories window, find and click "All Commands."

3. In the Commands window, click "ToolsRevisionMarksNext."

4. Put your cursor in the box labeled "Press new shortcut key."

5. Press the keyboard combination you want to use. For example, for the "Next Change" command (ToolsRevisionMarksNext), you could use ALT + SHIFT + N.

6. Click the "Assign" button.

7. Repeat steps 1 through 6 for the following commands:

ToolsRevisionMarksPrev ("Previous Change," ALT + SHIFT + P)

ToolsRevisionMarksAccept ("Accept Change," ALT + SHIFT + A)

ToolsRevisionMarksReject ("Reject Change," ALT + SHIFT + R)

8. Click the "Close" button.

Now by pressing the key combinations you specified, you'll be able to review, accept, and reject changes just as if you were using the toolbar buttons--but without the aggravation. As a bonus, you now know how to assign commands to keyboard combinations.

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

I received some great messages from readers in response to last week's article.

Anna Marshall wrote:

Thanks for another great Editorium Update! I enjoyed very much your proofreading sequence. It's essentially what I use, aided by your Editor's ToolKit and FileCleaner tools.

One step you might add to your sequence is viewing the text differently by changing the background color, using columns, or employing one of the other methods you listed in previous newsletters:

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1710581825

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1710626323

Although these methods don't completely substitute for a review of the printed document (for me), they get darn close.

Also, your sequence doesn't acknowledge the importance of interplay between text and images in the final document. I've never seen text stand with no changes once imported into a layout. Frustrating as it is to document managers and designers, the layout generally spotlights a need for minor text adjustments if not content adjustments (e.g., certain content commands more visual emphasis than intended).

Some designers I know import a rough draft of the text into the layout to nail text-design interplay issues up front, so that when final text comes through, it gets imported into a final layout, and there should be few surprises.

Brad Hurley wrote:

Thanks for the paperless proofreading tips--I used the same procedure when working on magazine articles that were reviewed by several outside experts and editors.

Here's another tip that might be useful to some of your readers: Recently, I edited a government publication that was put through an unplanned multi-agency review after the report had already been laid out in Quark. The process lasted several months, and there were extensive revisions. I saved a ton of time and hassle by buying a copy of Quark CopyDesk, which allowed me to make direct edits to the text in the Quark file. No need to give the designer marked-up hard copies, and CopyDesk protects the layout so the artist needn't worry about the editor messing up the design. Furthermore, CopyDesk lets you easily extract the text as a Word file, which allowed me to track all the changes I'd made: I extracted the text from the original CopyDesk file, and then when the revisions were complete I asked the designer to send me a new CopyDesk file. I extracted the text from the new file into another Word document and used Word's "Compare Documents" feature to reveal the differences between the two versions.

For me the real value of CopyDesk wasn't so much fitting the copy to the layout, but being able to make text edits directly to the Quark file without having to fax marked-up copy or e-mailing a commented-up PDF to the graphic designer. It reduces the opportunity for error and saves a lot of time.

Steve Hudson wrote:

Automated processes? Live on 'em 🙂 I generally use all of these:

Reapply all styles

Spell / grammar check

check for bad bookmarks (multi-paragraphs)

bookmark all headings ready for x-reffing

remove all un-reffed bookmarks

phrase finder to check consistent vocab use

Set page layouts

report on picture names, compare against directory

find slang words

strip bad spacing

prep for online use (cleans up tables, bullets and the like)

apply autocorrections

apply casing to headings

Anna Marshall wrote with the following question: "Here's a problem for you. Do you or any of your readers have a macro that will take comments out of the comments area and paste them into the running text of a document?"

If you, gentle reader, have such a macro that you'd be willing to share, please let me know.

Thanks to all for their comments and suggestions.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

Interested in a program designed specifically to handle revision control? You might want to try ComponentSoftware RCS, which can be used at no charge for single users. Here's what the Web site says:

"ComponentSoftware RCS (CS-RCS) is a powerful, inexpensive revision control system for Windows. Based on the widely used GNU RCS, it is fully integrated with the Windows Explorer, providing the most intuitive and easy-to-use configuration management and change control solution in the market. CS-RCS supports multi- platform workgroups, making it the ideal solution for sites that share common files on UNIX and Windows platforms.

"CS-RCS handles all types of documents including program files, project files, resource files, HTML documents, MS-Word documents, pictures and drawings.

"CS-RCS can use any file server or local drive to store the archive repository. Network connection to the archive repository can be LAN, corporate wide-area network (WAN), dial-in connection (RAS) and the Internet.

"CS-RCS Basic is used for general-purpose document revision management as well as for entry-level software configuration management. CS-RCS Pro includes advanced features needed for complex software and web development projects."

You can learn more (and try the program) here:

http://www.componentsoftware.com/Products/RCS/index.htm

Paperless Proofreading

I started in the publishing business as a proofreader, reading type set in hot metal on a Linotype machine. I'd compare the type against the edited manuscript and mark any discrepancies. Then back the type would go for corrections, with additional cycles of proofreading and corrections until the type was error free.

Now the Linotype machine is gone. My electronic text is imported into QuarkXPress, and the number of errors on galleys is vastly lower than in the old days when everything had to be rekeyed by hand. Proofreaders still look over the typeset galleys for errors the editor may have missed as well as widows, orphans, and bad line breaks. But then we're right back into the old correction cycle. Isn't there a way to make it go away?

It turns out that there is. I call it "paperless proofreading." The idea is that proofreading should be done on the edited Word document *before* typesetting takes place. Some of the advantages are:

* No paper is involved, eliminating printing costs, copying costs, postage costs, and time in transit.

* Editors can merge the proofread documents and then use Word's reviewing tools to jump quickly to each correction and accept or reject it. This decreases the time needed to reconcile galleys.

* The corrected manuscript goes directly into typesetting, eliminating the correction cycle after proofreading.

Disadvantages include:

* The author and proofreaders must have a computer, Microsoft Word, and the ability to send and receive email. However, if they don't have Microsoft Word, they can download and install the free OpenOffice.org software and use its Write module to make and track their corrections. You can learn more here:

http://www.openoffice.org

* There will need to be a separate proofreading for typography (bad breaks, etc.) and an accompanying correction cycle after the galleys have been typeset.

If you'd like to try this method of proofreading, here are the steps you'll need to follow:

PREPARING THE MANUSCRIPT

1. Edit your manuscript in Microsoft Word.

2. When you're ready to send the manuscript out for proofreading, make any tracked revisions permanent (so you don't have to review them later along with the proofreaders' revisions). Then save the manuscript with a new name, such as "My Galleys.doc."

3. "Protect" the manuscript so the proofreaders can't change it without revisions being tracked. To do so, click Tools > Protect Document > Tracked changes. I'd recommend using a password here, but write it down so you don't forget it. You might want to use a password that's the same from job to job or even for all your editors. Just don't give the password to authors or proofreaders. Word will ask for the password twice. Click OK and then save the document.

4. Send the manuscript to your author and proofreaders as an email attachment. In the message, include your name, phone number, and proofreading deadline along with any special instructions. (Since they now have access to Word's Find and Replace feature, you should probably instruct them to *call you* before using the feature to make extensive changes. If you've already done a spell check, you might also mention that.) Part of your instructions should be to delete and insert whole words, not just modify existing words. That will make reviewing the changes much easier later on.

The author and proofreaders will need to save the document to their hard drive, open it in Word, make their corrections in Microsoft Word (*not* WordPerfect, which doesn't handle revision tracking well), save the document, and return the document as an email attachment.

REVIEWING THE MANUSCRIPT

1. After the proofreading has been done and sent back to you, save the documents from the author and the proofreaders to your hard drive, being careful to give each one a unique name so they don't overwrite each other ("My Galleys Author.doc," "My Galleys Proofer 1.doc," "My Galleys Proofer 2.doc").

2. Open the author's copy of the proofread document to be your reconciled version.

3. Make sure revisions are showing (Tools > Track Changes > Highlight changes on screen) and note the color of the revisions. After you've merged the other documents into this one, you may want to give revisions in that color more weight because they were made by the author.

4. Open the document and merge each of the others into it by clicking Tools > Merge Documents.

5. "Unprotect" the document by clicking Tools > Unprotect Document and entering the password.

6. Save the document with a new name, such as "My Galleys Reconciled.doc."

7. Review the corrections and accept or reject them as needed. There are two different tools you can use to do this:

* The Accept or Reject Changes dialog.

* The Reviewing toolbar.

If you have Word 2002, the Accept or Reject Changes dialog will not be available--unless you know the secret way to get it back: Click Tools > Macro > Macros > Macros in: > Word commands > ToolsReviewRevisions > Run. Note that you can put this little beauty on a menu or toolbar for easy access:

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707444986

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707286867

You can also move your mouse cursor over a correction to show who made it (as long as you've turned on Tools > Options > View > Screen Tips).

USING THE ACCEPT OR REJECT CHANGES DIALOG

1. Click Tools > Track Changes > Accept or Reject Changes.

2. Click the Find button (or press F) to find the next correction.

3. Click the Accept button (or press A) to accept the correction. Click the Reject button (or press R) to reject it. Word will automatically go to the next correction. This has the advantage of speed but the disadvantage of not being able to review the text around the correction.

If you inadvertently reject a correction that you wanted to keep, click the Undo button to undo the rejection.

USING THE REVIEWING TOOLBAR

1. Click View > Toolbars > Reviewing. In the middle of the toolbar you'll notice two buttons with blue arrows on them, one pointing left and the other right. Click the button with the right-arrow to go to the next correction. Click the button with the left-arrow to go to the previous correction.

2. To the right of these two arrows are two more arrows, one with a checkmark and the other with an X. Click the one with the checkmark to accept the correction. Click the one with the X to reject (or stet) it. Word will *not* automatically go to the next correction. This is an advantage if you want to double-check the text around the correction but a disadvantage if you need to move quickly.

If you inadvertently reject a correction that you wanted to keep, press CTRL + Z to undo the rejection.

In Word 2002, you can limit your review to corrections by a certain reviewer. On the Reviewing toolbar, click Show. Then click "Reviewers" and clear the checkboxes except those next to the name of the reviewer whose changes you want to review. You'll find more information on tracking revisions in Word 2002 here:

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1710381892

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1711737396

After you've finished reviewing corrections, save the manuscript and send it to typesetting as usual.

Ah, but there'll still be a correction cycle because you'll want to review the typography in the typeset document. Well then, how about typesetting the document in Microsoft Word *before* proofreading takes place? That would eliminate the correction cycle entirely! You can learn more about typesetting in Word here:

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1708956278

Have you figured out some clever tips for streamlining the electronic production process? If so, I'd really like to hear about them, or just about your process in general. Please write to me here: mailto:editor [at symbol] editorium.com.

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

Seth R. Beckerman wrote:

There is a moderate list of web resources on the Council of Science Editors website:

http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/services_references.shtml

Alice Falk wrote:

The best place I've found for locating online works generally, not just references, is "The On-Line Books Page":

http://digital.library.upenn.edu/books/

There are online classical texts on the Perseus site:

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cache/perscoll_Greco-Roman.html

The site has fantastic search capabilities--look for a phrase in all of Plato's works at once! switch back and forth between Greek and English!

Thanks to Seth and Alice for these useful resources.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

Do you publish critical editions of classic texts? Would you welcome an easier way of handling the complex typesetting and formatting associated with margin references, Wadding numbers, variants, and citations? If so, you owe it to yourself to try Imprimatur. Imprimatur is a markup language interpreter used to typeset critical edition texts with almost unbelievable ease. The program takes an RTF file (saved from Word, for example) and almost magically formats it as needed. Even if you don't publish critical editions, this program is worth a look just to see the amazing techniques it uses to produce a typeset document in Word. You can learn more here:

http://www.geocities.com/imprimaturweb/

Word Expert Quiz

This week, just for fun (and for review), I've created a quiz. Use it to rate your skill in editing on the computer, using 1 as the lowest level ("I never do this") and 5 as the highest ("I always do this"):

1 2 3 4 5 I use styles and eschew manual formatting.

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1711522967

1 2 3 4 5 I use keyboard shortcuts and avoid reaching for the mouse.

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1703361394

1 2 3 4 5 I use spell check as a way to catch typographical errors.

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1700310413

1 2 3 4 5 I use AutoCorrect and AutoText to speed up text entry.

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1705865120

1 2 3 4 5 I use find and replace, including wildcards, to fix repetitive errors and inconsistencies.

http://www.editorium.com/ftp/adancedsearch.zip

1 2 3 4 5 I use customized templates and styles to format documents.

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1700934923

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1705536230

1 2 3 4 5 I customize Word's menus, toolbars, and keyboard shortcuts to fit the way I work.

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707444986

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707286867

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707100224

1 2 3 4 5 I record macros to perform repetitive tasks.

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1706651129

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1706748016

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1706832239

1 2 3 4 5 I use other macros and add-in software to provide features not available in Word alone.

Using "Found" Macros

http://www.topica.com/lists/editorium/read/message.html?mid=1707012536

1 2 3 4 5 I consciously seek to learn more about editing in Microsoft Word.

http://www.editorium.com/euindex.htm

http://www.mvps.org/word/

Scoring

Total the scores for all of the questions. Then find your ranking:

10-20 Clueless newbie. Review the information available through the links above.

20-30 Typical editor. Review the information for any items you rated 3 or below.

30-40 Editing expert. Review the information for any items you rated 3 or below.

40-50 Word guru. To reach the ranks of the truly elite, learn to *program* Word macros using Visual Basic for Applications. You can get started here:

http://www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/MacrosVBA/VBABasicsIn15Mins.htm

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

After reading last week's article "What's Your Handle," an anonymous reader wrote:

As a veteran of many find-and-replace operations, I enjoyed your article about "handles" and I thought that that's a very good way of explaining the concept. However, in this particular example, if I had been doing it, I would have first selected all the text in the document and made it all Body Text. In this way, I wouldn't have had to do your last step.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

Holy smoke! Look at all the online reference works at Bartleby.com!

http://www.bartleby.com/reference/

What's Your Handle?

When faced with a situation requiring a complex find and replace in Microsoft Word, many people have no idea even where to begin. If you're one of those people, here's the secret: Find the handle.

What do I mean by "handle"? Something your find and replace routine can grab onto to do what it needs to do. For example, a few weeks ago I was faced with a 500-page manuscript that had no style formatting for its different text levels--something I'm sure your authors would *never* give you.

Basically, the text looked like this (but there was a lot more of it, of course):

This Is a Heading

This is some text. And more text. And more. And really several paragraphs more.

JML

This Is a Heading

This is some text. And more text. And more. And really several paragraphs more.

ED

This Is a Heading

This is some text. And more text. And more. And really several paragraphs more.

CBD

So there I am, badly needing styles to be applied and yet not wanting to do it by hand. The first thing I looked for was a handle--some regularly occurring pattern that I could find and then replace with itself but now with a style applied. Since this author, like most authors, was utterly ignorant of the proper way to put line spacing in front of a heading (by modifying "space before" in the heading style), he'd inserted two extra carriage returns in front of every main heading--and nowhere else. There was my handle!

So, after calling up the Replace dialog (Edit > Replace), I typed this into the "Find What" box:

^13^13^13(*)^13

And I typed the Find What Expression code, surrounded by carriage returns, into the "Replace With" box:

^p1^p

Incidentally, you can learn more about all of the wildcards in this article in my paper "Advanced Find and Replace in Microsoft Word," which you can download--free!--here:

http://www.editorium.com/ftp/advancedfind.zip

After typing in my find and replace strings, I clicked the More button to display the other Find and Replace options. I clicked the Format button, then "Styles," and then "Heading 1" so the replaced text would be formatted with that style. I put a check in the "Use Wildcards" checkbox. Then I clicked the "Replace All" button.

Ta-da! All of my main headings (and author attributions) were now formatted with the Heading 1 style.

So, how about those author attributions? There sure were a lot of them--each on its own line at the end of each short article. And each one was simply the author's initials--JML, ED, CBD, and the like. There was my handle--two or more capital letters preceded and followed by a carriage return.

In the "Find What" box I typed this:

^13([A-Z]{2,})^13

And in the "Replace With" box I typed this:

^p1^p

Again, I clicked the Format button, then "Styles," and this time "Heading 2" so the replaced text would be formatted with that style. I made sure the check was still in the "Use Wildcards" checkbox. Then I clicked the "Replace All" button, which formatted all of those authors' initials with the Heading 2 style.

The final thing I needed to style was the paragraphs between each occurrence of Heading 1 text and Heading 2 text. There were no obvious handles associated with that text, but it did have those styled headings above and below it. Could I use those for my handles? Yes, but first I'd need to mark them with some arbitrary codes. Why? Because there's no way to find Heading 1 *and* some text *and* Heading 2, all in one pass. So here are the searches (this time with "Use Wildcards" turned *off*) that I used to mark those headings:

Find What:

Heading 1 formatting

Replace With:

^&

Find What:

Heading 2 formatting

Replace With:

^&

That left me with an

code at the end of each Heading 1 (really, at the beginning of the paragraph following it) and an

code at the beginning of each Heading 2. Excellent handles indeed!

My final step was to search for those codes and the text between them, removing the codes and styling the text as Body Text. Piece of cake:

Find What (with "Use Wildcards" turned on):

(*)

Replace With (formatted with the Body Text style):

1

And that did the job. I still had some cleanup to do (like eliminating double carriage returns), but by looking for the handles in the text I was editing, I was able to style a 500-page document in less than five minutes.

The next time you're faced with a similar chore, don't just slog through the document doing everything by hand. Instead, see if there are some handles that will let you automate the whole process. You won't always find them, but you'll find them often enough to make the effort well worth your while. Please note that you should always back up your documents and run your find and replace routines on some test documents before proceeding with the real thing.

If you spend much time doing the kind of thing this article describes, you really should try our RazzmaTag program, which will automate a whole raft of complex find-and-replace operations over a whole raft of documents. You can learn more here:

http://www.editorium.com/razzmatag.htm

_________________________________________

READERS WRITE

Eric Fletcher wrote:

Late last year as part of a message I sent you regarding styles, I mentioned my use of Word 2002's Task Pane. I've been using it a lot and have found it to be an extremely useful tool in more ways than I'd thought. But don't rely on the built-in Help: it is particularly sparse and almost makes it look like the feature was added at the last moment. Here are some of my observations in no particular order.

1. I've made a tool button to be able to pop the Task Pane up whenever I need it. I have two monitors, so I float the task pane (and other toolbars) in the second one most of the time. However, on my wife's single monitor, a button makes it easier to be able to hide and restore the Task Pane (instead of the View | Task Pane menu). You can use a preset button or make your own.

2. The Clipboard panel holds up to 24 elements as you cut or copy. A 25th pushes the first off the stack. You can paste any item by clicking on it, but be aware that a right click lets you delete a clipboard item. This is handy when you need to cut something in a series of copies, or if you inadvertently copy something you don't really need. The feature has the utility of the old "spike" function but lets you manage the contents in a way Spike never did. Excel users should note that the Word and Excel task panes share the same content, so copying between the two is easy. (Very handy for ad hoc copying of addresses from Excel to Word when a mail merge is too much bother!)

3. The Styles and Formatting panel (S&F) has some very useful features for cleaning up document formats. If you've ever examined a Word file in a text editor, you may have noticed how all formatting is collected at the end and each different instance has pointers back into the text where it is to be applied. S&F appears to use this to great advantage: each different instance of any type of formatting can be listed in the S&F panel depending on what you choose to show via dropdown at the bottom of the panel.

The feature is not particularly intuitive, so open a document and try it. Consider a document with a few levels of headings and some manually applied formatting. Bring up the Task Pane and set it to the S&F panel. When you click on a subhead--say Heading 3--in the text, the S&F panel will display the style name at the top. If the selection is a variant of the defined style, the difference(s) will be noted: for example, "Heading 3 + Garamond" when I set a Heading 3 to the Garamond font. But click to the right side of the box and pull down the list to see the options:

Select all XX Instance(s) lets you select all instances within the document but also gives you a *count* of how many there are. (This is very useful if you need to do a count of instances of a particular style: how many bibliographic references are there in this document? Is this the only time I used a Heading 5?)

Clear Formatting removes formatting from the selection.

New Style brings up the dialog to make a new style based on the selection.

Modify Style lets you change the style definition.

Reveal Formatting switches to a different panel to give you all the specific formatting details.

But with the selection still in the modified Heading 3, scroll down and look at the options available for the "Heading 3" style: "Update to match selection" lets you modify the defined style to match the selection in one step. Very useful!

The other different option is Delete. This removes the style definition but doesn't delete the formatted content. In fact, it appears to have the same effect as the "Clear formatting" style selection. Particularly if I am in the process of preparing a template, I like to go through and remove any unnecessary style definitions before finalizing it.

3. When there has been a lot of "fiddling" done to make pages fit, a document can often have numerous variations on style (for example, "Body Text + Condensed by 0.1pt" or "Body Text + Before: 4pt"). If you need to re-use such copy, these variations can create headaches later. Use the S&F panel to browse through and eliminate all such variants. (I use it to remove all extraneous variations to prepare copy for conversion to HTML since I then don't have to deal with manually removing all the code Word prepares for me.)

4. Use the "Show" dropdown in the S&F panel to manage what formatting is displayed. The "Formatting in use" shows only the formatting used within the document (styles and variants of them); "Available formatting" adds the styles defined for the currently-applied template; "Available styles" lists only the styles and without the variants; and "All styles" displays the styles from the current template plus the names of Word's "built-in" styles. This latter option is lengthy, but you can pare it down by choosing "Custom . . ." and selecting which styles you want to have displayed.

Use the Custom pulldown to define what variants should be displayed (font, paragraph, bullet & numbering) and to add the "Clear formatting" option to the style list (which also puts it at the top of the style toolbar pulldown, incidentally). The selection of styles to make visible or not changes by the category selected. Finally, you can save the options in the template so it is set for other or later use.

5. The Reveal Formatting panel (RF) shows all the details about the format of the current selection. If you select "Distinguish source style" at the bottom of the panel, the display shows the underlying style and any differences--showing the detail much as the variants are shown in the S&F panel. The pulldown options for the selection let you clear formatting, choose all other similar formatting in the document, but also change the format to match the surrounding text. I'm not entirely sure what rules are used for this: a word set with French language was set to English but only if I selected the whole word; but a word set in green was changed to black when the selection was within the word.

Select something and then turn on the "Compare with another selection" checkbox. A second box appears, and when you make a second selection, the panel itemizes the differences.

My documents are cleaner and smaller since I've incorporated the Task Pane into my set of Word tools.

Many thanks to Eric for these useful revelations.

_________________________________________

RESOURCES

Jean Hollis Weber has done it again with her article "Escape from the Grammar Trap," now available on the TECHWR-L site, here:

http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/magazine/writing/grammartrap.html

The article explains why editors too often focus on details and not the bigger picture; how much attention they should pay to formal rules of grammar, punctuation, and usage; and how they can distinguish between essential and nonessential rules. I've worked with many editors and proofreaders who could benefit from Jean's words of wisdom.

Like the article? Be sure to check out Jean's books, newsletter, and other goodies at her Web site, the Technical Editors' Eyrie:

http://www.jeanweber.com/